Posts

Best Divorce case lawyer in Delhi

Image
Advocate Devashish Maharishi sunaina rao kommineni v. abhiram balusu, MAT.APP.(F.C) 135 of 2024, decided on 28-5-2025 Delhi High Court: In the present case, an appeal was filed by the wife challenging the order dated 15-4-2024, whereby the guardianship petition filed by the wife under Sections 7, 8, 9 and 25 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 (‘G&W Act’) was rejected. Further, the petition was also filed by the husband praying for a writ of Habeas Corpus, directing the production of the male minor child of the parties, and further seeking permission to take the minor child back to Arizona, USA. The Division Bench of Navin Chawla* and Renu Bhatnagar, JJ., stated that merely because the wife had decided to stay back in India and had got the minor child admitted to a school here, would not, make the minor child an ordinary resident of Delhi (India). Such forceful removal/detention, even by a parent, at a place that is not the natural habitation of the minor child, would not render s...

Best Divorce case lawyer in Delhi

 Advocate Devashish Maharishi 137, J-Extension, Laxmi Nagar, Delhi, 110092 Phone Number 08595722509 Kamalika Majumdar Nee Das v. Subhapriya Majumdar, FAT 68 of 2020, decided on 11-06-2025 Calcutta High Court: In an appeal filed by the appellant (wife) challenging the judgment and decree dated 21-11-2019 and 18-12-2019, issued by the Additional District Judge in a matrimonial suit wherein the marriage was dissolved between the parties by divorce, the Division Bench of Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya and Uday Kumar, JJ. set aside the decree of divorce and held that divorce decree cannot be granted to a party (petitioner) who perpetrated foundational cruelty (e.g., deliberate marital deception) of greater magnitude than any alleged misconduct by the other spouse, even if the marriage is irretrievably broken down, as it would constitute a miscarriage of justice and violate the principle of “clean hands”. The marriage was solemnised at Dakshineswar Maa Kali Temple on 21-01-2010 and registered ...

Maintenance

Advocate Devashish Maharishi 137, J-Extension, Laxmi Nagar, Delhi, 110092 Phone Number 08595722509 case details- Mustt. Lozzatan Begum v. Shahidul Islam, Crl.Pet. No. 90 of 2021, decided on 04-06-2025 Gauhati High Court: In an application seeking quashing of the impugned order whereby the Sessions Court denied maintenance to the petitioner-wife for the child, the Single Judge Bench of Parthivjyoti Saikia, J., allowed the application, holding that the wife was driven out of the matrimonial house due to the child’s complexion not matching the parents and thus, the wife had shown sufficient reason for living separately.  the petitioner-wife filed an application under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (‘CrPC’) seeking maintenance from her husband, the respondent. The Trial Court granted her maintenance of Rs. 2,500 for the petitioner and another amount of Rs. 500 for her child. Aggrieved, the husband filed a revision petition wherein the Sessions Court refused to gran...